For Christmas I received a fascinating present from a good friend - my extremely own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was entirely composed by AI, with a couple of simple prompts about me provided by my pal Janet.

It's an interesting read, and very amusing in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty style of composing, but it's also a bit recurring, and extremely verbose. It might have exceeded Janet's prompts in collecting information about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a strange, repetitive hallucination in the form of my feline (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, forum.altaycoins.com he informed me he had actually offered around 150,000 personalised books, generally in the US, given that pivoting from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to produce them, based on an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who created it, can order any additional copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone producing one in anyone's name, including celebs - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book contains a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is fictional, created by AI, and designed "entirely to bring humour and delight".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is meant as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get sold further.

He wishes to widen his variety, generating different genres such as sci-fi, and maybe using an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted form of consumer AI - offering AI-generated goods to human clients.

It's likewise a bit terrifying if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to generate, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar content based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are discussing information here, we actually suggest human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is photos. It's works of art. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to discover how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were phony, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not think the usage of generative AI for creative functions must be banned, however I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without permission should be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be extremely effective however let's build it morally and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have chosen to block AI designers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have actually decided to team up - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would allow AI developers to use creators' material on the internet to assist develop their designs, krakow.net.pl unless the rights holders choose out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He mentions that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is also strongly against removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and an entire lot of pleasure," says the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening among its best carrying out industries on the unclear pledge of development."

A federal government spokesperson said: "No relocation will be made until we are absolutely confident we have a practical plan that provides each of our goals: increased control for ideal holders to assist them accredit their material, access to top quality material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI designers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI strategy, a nationwide data library containing public data from a vast array of sources will also be provided to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to increase the safety of AI with, amongst other things, companies in the sector required to share details of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has actually now been reversed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is stated to want the AI sector to deal with less guideline.

This comes as a number of lawsuits versus AI firms, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been secured by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the web without their consent, and used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of aspects which can make up - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training information and whether it must be paying for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to ponder, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being the many downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its technology for a fraction of the cost of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I think that at the moment, if I actually want a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weak point in generative AI tools for larger tasks. It is full of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be quite tough to check out in parts since it's so long-winded.

But provided how quickly the tech is evolving, I'm uncertain the length of time I can remain positive that my considerably slower human writing and editing skills, larsaluarna.se are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest developments in global innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.